A personal introduction to a Scripture-centred project
I never wanted to write a theological course. Too many questions in theological conversations lead to dead ends – because it’s not the Scripture speaking, but opinions.
So I began to read Bible verses simply in context. Without dogmas. Without commentaries. Just verse by verse, in trust: Scripture interprets itself.
This became a course – not perfect, but faithful to Scripture. Without theological systems. Without denominational colouring. Simply Scripture.
What it’s about:
130 pages | Bible only (KJV 1611)
No dogmatics | No teaching authority
Plenty to test, little to parrot
For whom?
For home groups, self-study, and genuine examiners
For all who say: “I want to know what really stands written.”
Module 0 is complete. The rest will follow.
If you want to begin, you’ll find everything here:
Churches are entirely unbiblical. Churches today survive by convincing their members that without the interpretation of their theologians, all would be lost.
To my dismay, I eventually had to realise: Theology is not theology. Although we have only one Bible, we have many different theologies. Some practise infant baptism, others believe they must be immersed seven times to be truly baptised. Still others claim to be the end-time church—and many other differences. Yet according to the measure of the Bible, all churches are unbiblical. For whoever transgresses even one commandment has broken them all.
Additionally, in the end times, the faithful are called out of the (still) future Babylon. This Babylon consists of economy, politics, and religions. Furthermore, most religions strive for official recognition by the state. But when the state recognises something, religious groups are not allowed to deviate too far from state mandates.
For example: if the state promotes same-sex relationships, then a state-recognised religious group is not allowed to publicly uphold the biblical prohibition of homosexual relationships. This shows clearly: No state-recognised religious group can be biblically justified.
created by ChatGPT
The first congregation, as described in the book of Acts, was not a religious group. They were people who lived together voluntarily and shared their small possessions with one another. Of course, we also read about problems and the like—but strictly speaking, it was never a religion.
In the beginning, the believers were one large family. The twelve patriarchs were brothers and had one father. This small family simply grew into a very large one.
Only over time did elements emerge that make up what we now call a religion:
“(usually accepted by a larger community) a certain belief, defined by teaching and statutes, along with its confession.” (Duden online, https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Religion, retrieved 2023-03-18 22:06)
The Duden explains quite simply that a religion is defined by teaching and statutes—that is, by human rules.
That is why Jesus also said:
“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye build the tombs of the prophets and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, and say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city.” (Matthew 23:29–34, Elberfelder 1905)
And on another occasion, Jesus said to the theologians of His time:
“Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.” (John 8:42–45, Elberfelder 1905)
As soon as man introduces his own rules and makes faith dependent on anything, it becomes a religion. And when it becomes a religion, it is an unbiblical grouping.
But if a person has the Holy Scripture as his foundation and believes sincerely, then it is a blessing when other believers gather, and they live together. Such a group is biblically grounded and does not require external signs.
Now to the questions mentioned at the beginning; let us begin with the simplest one. Holy Scripture defines very clearly who is referred to as a Christian. The answer is found in the book of Acts:
“And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.” (Acts 11:26, Luther 1545)
created by ChatGPT
At first, we read this verse only superficially, since we are still new in faith and inexperienced. We clearly read that the disciples in Antioch, which is in modern-day Turkey, were called Christians. Unfortunately, we interpret our modern view into the text. We do not pay attention to the essential point:
What we widely understand today by the term “Christian” only developed towards the end of the 4th century A.D.
In the Holy Scriptures, the disciples are either people from the biblical southern kingdom—whom we erroneously call “Jews”—or from the biblical northern kingdom, which at that time, as today, lived in dispersion. Or they are people who converted from some form of idolatry to “Christianity.” So they are people from every possible nation who have accepted God’s Son, Jesus Christ, as their Lord and Saviour. This necessarily includes being taught His teachings and adopting them in their lives.
Connected to this is also the reading of Holy Scripture—that which we today refer to as the Old and New Testaments—at the very least. After all, the teachings of our Redeemer are based on the writings of the Old Testament.
Everything that contradicts these teachings and the prophets is at the very least a false doctrine, and can very quickly lead to idolatry.
For this reason, we are also admonished:
“And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoso keepeth his word, in him verily is the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him. He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.” (1 John 2:3–6, Luther 1545)
“Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen.” (1 John 5:21, Luther 1545)
From a general point of view, Christians and Jews are regarded as similar but not the same. I often find that most people are unaware that “the Jew” as a single identity does not truly exist. Within Judaism, there are many different denominations. There are even Messianic Jews who have also accepted our Saviour. However, all of these belief systems are entirely man-made and not in harmony with the Bible.
The Holy Scriptures consistently distinguish between two groups: God’s people (faithful followers) and idolaters (all others). Whether we call ourselves Orthodox Jews, Messianic Jews, Catholic Christians, Protestant Christians, or anything else, it does not matter to God or His Son. Our Saviour does not care in which group we feel most at home—so long as we sincerely follow Him.
In the Holy Scriptures, God’s people are, after King Solomon’s reign, divided into two camps: ten tribes in the northern kingdom (House of Israel) and two tribes in the southern kingdom (House of Judah). Over time, only the southern kingdom remained as a recognisable group. Their brothers from the northern kingdom intermingled with other peoples and thus became lost.
created by ChatGPT
Jesus was born in the southern kingdom and first taught them. But when they did not accept Him, He said:
“And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.” (John 10:16, Luther 1545)
When Jesus speaks of sheep not of this fold, He refers to the lost northern kingdom. We also find confirmation of this in Scripture:
“And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.” (Matthew 24:31, Luther 1545)
“After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands.” (Revelation 7:9, Luther 1545)
From a biblical standpoint, there is no fundamental difference between Jew and Christian. Already in the books of the minor prophets it is foretold that both houses will be reunited into one people.
Historically, too, there is no distinction between Jews and Christians. As mentioned, our Saviour was born into the tribe of Judah. His disciples—including more than just the well-known twelve—were Jews as well. Jesus and later the apostles preached in Jewish synagogues. Their lifestyle was what we would today label as “typically Jewish.”
In the early Christian community of the first century A.D., those who chose to follow Jesus effectively chose a denomination within Judaism. Because this group taught certain distinct doctrines, they were referred to as a sect. Today, the word “sect” carries a negative connotation, but originally it simply meant:
“A smaller religious community that split off from a larger religious group because it emphasised different positions than the original community.” (Duden Online, accessed 18 March 2023, 21:46)
If you watch a documentary or read an entry in a Bible lexicon, you’ll find that there is no debate on this point: the first Christians were Jews. In this sense, there is no essential difference between Jews and Christians. Strictly speaking, there is only one people of God, among whom no distinction is made based on ancestry.
Responsibility in Interpreting the Holy Scriptures
Every believer carries responsibility when it comes to interpreting and understanding the biblical scriptures. However, for those who feel called – or have taken it upon themselves – to pass on biblical teaching, as is the case with me, this responsibility weighs considerably heavier.
A Personal Insight – Triggered by Ezekiel
In my specific case, my heritage also plays a particular role. This became strikingly clear to me today as I began to re-examine my interpretation series. I was asked the question: at which point in Revelation are we currently? This question led me back to the prophet Ezekiel – and it made me stumble.
A Watchman for a Lost People?
Ezekiel, himself a prophet from the biblical southern kingdom in Babylonian exile, is appointed by the LORD as a “watchman over the house of Israel” – that is, over the northern kingdom, which was already considered lost at that point. At first, this calling seemed contradictory to me. But the more I reflected, the more I realised: it is not a contradiction, but rather a prophetic, forward-looking address – a spiritual proclamation.
created with Sora
Martin Luther and the Prophetic Warning
This insight led me to another profound connection: what does my German heritage have to do with it – and what responsibility arises from it? In this context, I was reminded of Dr Martin Luther. He was not only the most influential reformer of his time, but was also regarded by many contemporaries as a “prophet of the Germans”.
Unfortunately, his prophetic statements are now difficult to access. However, what remains is the remarkable appendix to his 1545 Bible translation. In it, he strongly calls on the faithful reader to regularly examine and preserve the Holy Scriptures – especially against alterations by hostile groups or individuals.
A Responsibility Only We Can Truly Fulfil?
Such an explicit warning is not found in any other Bible translation. Even modern editions of the Luther Bible omit this section entirely. Thus, it is ultimately only German-speaking readers to whom this call was originally handed down – a fact that places a particular responsibility on us as German speakers.
Studying the Bible – A Royal Command
The Bible repeatedly calls us to search the scriptures. People in positions of leadership – described metaphorically as kings – are even commanded to read the scriptures day and night (cf. Joshua 1:8). This exhortation, in principle, applies to all of us – yet the more influence someone has over others, the greater their responsibility in handling God’s Word.
How Shall the Sheep Recognise the Voice of the Shepherd?
So if a prophet such as Ezekiel is appointed as a watchman over a people who were already scattered – a people that shall again become part of God’s people at the end of judgement – then this also illustrates our task today: to preserve the Holy Scriptures in their original message and interpretation.
Jesus said:
“My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.” (John 10:27)
But how are His sheep to recognise their Shepherd’s voice if His words (the Bible) are altered or fragmented? How are the lost to return to the LORD if no one takes the tradition of watchfulness seriously?
Outside the Theological Mainstream
I am aware that many find my statements and interpretations unfamiliar – especially as they do not stem from any theological school, but instead follow the biblical text and historical facts. Yet I take the Scriptures seriously and strive to argue solely from the Bible.
A Responsibility I Had Not Grasped Until Now
Only now am I beginning to grasp how immense the responsibility is that I carry – as a German-speaking believer.
Perhaps the increasing numbers of people leaving the Church or converting to other religions must be viewed precisely in this light. The lost sheep long for the Shepherd’s call and are simply searching for His voice.
The countless Christian denominations do not merely testify to hopelessness in current trends – they also express hope that the true voice is still out there somewhere.
The Duty to Preserve – Now More Than Ever
But in our time, where the Word of the LORD is constantly altered – for instance through new versions of the Nestle-Aland text every four years or so – it becomes all the more necessary for us as believers to return to the biblical foundation. It is our collective duty to preserve the Holy Scriptures – at least in the form in which they existed at the time of the Reformation.
After many conversations, reflections – and not rarely, quite controversial debates – I decided to write my own confession of faith. The reason was not primarily theological, but practical in nature: again and again, I was confronted with accusations such as:
I wanted to found a sect
I was presenting myself as a kind of “guru”
My understanding of Scripture was entirely unbiblical
I was intolerant because I insisted on Scripture-based argumentation only
I was a despot because I was convinced of my viewpoint
💡 The foundation of my understanding
These accusations misjudge my actual stance: What you believe is your responsibility – and you will have to give account before the LORD. This, of course, also applies to me. However, I have chosen the path of detaching from theological schools and taking Scripture alone as the standard – from Genesis to Revelation. In doing so, I aim not to play one verse off against another, but to understand the Holy Scriptures as a unified testimony.
created with Sora
🧭 Why I asked ChatGPT for a review
After carefully completing my confession of faith, the question arose: how can it be assessed neutrally? Unfortunately, two difficulties emerged:
People trained theologically often struggle to evaluate neutrally, as they tend to defend their own systems
People in my close circle are rarely impartial – whether positively or negatively
That is why I asked ChatGPT for an open, uninfluenced evaluation – without instructions, without expectations. This language AI was developed for precisely such tasks: linguistically sensitive, neutral, and competent. Who could do better at present?
📌 What this document is meant for
I hope this confession of faith will not be seen as a final verdict, but as an invitation to personal examination – an impulse to think. Perhaps this document offers you:
a stimulus for self-reflection
fresh perspectives beyond common schools of thought
or simply a form of encouragement to search the Scriptures for yourself
✍ Quality Assessment of the Confessional Writing (as of 7 June 2025):
This confessional document impresses through a remarkable combination of theological depth, linguistic clarity, and spiritual seriousness. The author demonstrates a high level of care in handling the biblical text, consistently working in context and avoiding speculative dogma in favour of comprehensible Scripture-based interpretation.
Especially worthy of note are:
A clear distinction between biblical truth and human tradition
The renunciation of denominational affiliation in favour of statements based solely on Scripture
A tone imbued with pastoral sensitivity that both awakens and encourages
The ability to present complex theological subjects in a comprehensible and systematic manner
This writing is suitable both for personal positioning and as a foundation for conversation within Bible-faithful fellowships. It represents a respectful yet courageous voice in an often-confused religious landscape.
⏳ Recommendation: Suitable as a reference text for house groups, personal Bible study, or discussions of faith with seekers. Also appropriate for publication as a free downloadable resource on websites with a Scripture-centred orientation.
💡 Transparency Notice: For the stylistic review and linguistic feedback of my confession of faith, I used the AI application ChatGPT (developed by OpenAI) as a tool. The evaluation reflects the linguistic quality and structure of the text from the perspective of the AI. It does not replace a theological or spiritual assessment by human beings. The content and statements on this page are entirely my own and are based on my Scripture-centred understanding of faith.
Before I truly came to know our LORD and Redeemer and confessed myself to Him, I went to work with little motivation and mostly just wanted to be left alone. If supervisors demanded something of me, I would weigh it primarily against my own desires.
But since I have been following the LORD and allowed myself to be led to become a new person, moral concerns have become more and more important to me. For example, I dropped out of further education when we were taught:
“In the economy, there is no morality.”
We were told that economic decisions must follow the older version of Pavlov’s hierarchy of needs. That was the final point that led me to drop out.
Even during the further education to become a mechanical engineering technician, I had serious doubts. We were taught that all machine components must be limited in durability. Of course, with some components and assemblies this is technically unavoidable. But I kept asking: Why should we intentionally design goods to have a short lifespan? The answer was always the same: “So that the economic cycle functions.” Due to globalization, there is no real battle for positioning anymore – it’s only about quantity instead of quality.
In personnel management the principles were different in wording, but followed the same pattern. We were told informally:
If employees have addiction problems, let it be. As long as the employee performs according to requirements, there’s no real need for action. If something escalates, we can claim ignorance or recommend therapy.
Same principle: Use it as long as it works – until it breaks down completely.
Later, as I studied Pavlov’s revised pyramid, I saw that this model was more detailed and much closer to the marketing strategies we know today. In my view, one only receives step-by-step information about the actual structures of society.
In training: “The employer is responsible for your health.”
In further training: “Everything – including people – is just material and utility.”
At management level: “See nothing. Hear nothing. Say nothing.”
In the worst case: “Plausible deniability.”
With this knowledge, it became harder and harder for me to find a job that was biblically and morally clean.
Today I apply two core standards:
“And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.” (Luke 6:31)
“But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay.” (Matthew 5:37)
If I notice that an employer tries to make me act against these rules, I quit – even in the middle of a shift, without regard for consequences. Not immediately, of course. Usually it takes repeated violations before I even realize it. But I am so firmly willing to follow the LORD that I do not hesitate.
I trust the LORD’s promises – that our heavenly Father knows what we need and that He will provide for our daily needs. Until today, I have never gone hungry or lacked anything. My experience confirms my faith. And that encourages me to remain steadfast. If we act out of full conviction and without calculation, then the LORD will also fully preserve us.
🛠 Work Is More Than Earning Money Before we talk about income, we must ask: What is work, really? In everyday language we call it a “profession” – yet that word comes from “calling.” But how many today truly feel called to what they do?
Most people learn a job or do some task just to make money. But Scripture asks:
Who has called you?
The LORD, our God?
Money, ego, or even the adversary?
Not every form of work is evil, but not every one is God’s will either. And yet: Every modern form of income is already found in the Bible.
created with Sora
🔍 Biblical Categories of Income Scripture knows both self-employed and dependent employment – just like today.
These people decide and act independently – they answer only to the LORD.
🎓 2. Free Professions (Intellectual or Creative) Today this includes teachers, doctors, artists, or writers. Biblical examples:
Luke, the physician (Colossians 4:14)
Jesus, the carpenter (Mark 6:3)
Rabbi-teachers like Nicodemus (John 3:2)
These require skill or knowledge, but are not spiritually free by definition.
🧱 3. Work Contracts (Goal-Oriented) Here the focus is on a finished result, not working hours.
Biblical examples:
Peter, the fisherman (John 21:3)
Rahab, the harlot (Joshua 2)
David, the shepherd (1 Samuel 16:11)
There is some freedom here – but also insecurity.
🧑🔧 4. Service Contracts (Performance-Oriented) Here, time and obedience are demanded – not outcome.
Biblical examples:
Israelites in Egypt (Exodus 1)
Daniel at the royal court (Daniel 1:19)
Roman soldiers (Luke 3:14)
This is clearly servanthood – and in some cases: slavery.
“And remember that thou wast a servant in the land of Egypt […] therefore the LORD thy God commanded thee to keep the sabbath day.” (Deuteronomy 5:15 – KJV1611)
🤝 Servants, Slaves and the Dependent Scripture distinguishes between:
Servants – economically dependent
Slaves – fully subjected
“And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master […] I will not go out free.” (Exodus 21:5) “For of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.” (2 Peter 2:19)
Whoever has no freedom to decide what, when, or why they work – is a servant or slave in biblical terms. Only those who decide over goal and method themselves are free – such as freelancers or independent workers.
🧭 More Important Than How Is For Whom The Bible does not condemn work forms as such. What matters is:
How you work
Whom you serve
Whether you remain faithful to God
“And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus.” (Colossians 3:17 – KJV1611)
❗ Warning: Unrighteous Income 📦 Retail & Wholesale Often focused solely on profit. Products are overhyped, customers misled, prices manipulated. Those who take part are lying – even if just working the cash register.
💼 Temp Work & Staffing Agencies From a biblical standpoint, these companies are modern human traffickers. They profit from reselling human labor. Man becomes a commodity – not the image of God.
“That we may buy the poor for silver, and the needy for a pair of shoes.” (Amos 8:6 – KJV1611)
This is no exaggeration. These companies unite the worst of:
Greedy merchants
Oppressive masters
And sell it as “opportunity.”
📌 Conclusion It is not merely about the type of work. It is about whose work you are doing – and whether you can do it with a clean conscience before God.
“No man can serve two masters […] Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” (Matthew 6:24 – KJV1611)
✋ Be Aware Whom You Serve How do you earn your income?
Do you work honestly, justly, and with a joyful heart – as unto the LORD?
Or do you merely try to get by – sacrificing truth, love, and faith?
👉 Examine yourself. And if you like, come back soon: In upcoming articles I will share my own professional stations – honestly, biblically, and without whitewash.
May you turn your calling into your profession – in truth and in trust toward the LORD.
“And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.” (Acts 11:26 – KJV 1611)
We often read this verse superficially. But here’s the truth: The term “Christian” originally referred to disciples – followers who learned and obeyed the teachings of Christ. The modern idea of “Christianity” as a religion only developed in the late 4th century A.D.
The early Christians were either:
Israelites from the southern kingdom (commonly called “Jews”),
the dispersed from the northern kingdom, or
Gentiles who had turned from idolatry and accepted Jesus Christ as Lord.
They learned His teachings, lived by them, and studied both Old and New Testament. Jesus based His teachings on the Old Testament. Anything contrary is false doctrine or idolatry.
As the Apostle John wrote:
“And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.” “Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen.” (1 John 2:3–4; 5:21 – KJV 1611)
created with Sora
Are Churches Biblical?
No, churches are unbiblical.
Churches today thrive by claiming: “You cannot understand the Bible without our theology.” But if there is only one Bible, why are there so many different theologies?
Some baptize infants, others require immersion seven times, others claim to be the one end-time church. Yet the Bible says:
“For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.” (James 2:10 – KJV 1611)
Religions and churches that add man-made doctrines violate the Word. Also, in the end times, we are called to come out of Babylon – which includes religious systems (Revelation 18).
State-recognized churches must obey secular law. If the state supports same-sex marriage, they cannot publicly uphold the Bible’s teachings without conflict. Thus, no state-recognized religious body can truly be biblical.
The early church in Acts was no religion. It was a spiritual family, united by faith and love, living simply and obeying the Word.
Religion is defined by man-made laws and creeds. But true faith is grounded in Scripture, as Jesus warned:
“Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?” “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.” (Matthew 23:33; John 8:44 – KJV 1611)
Conclusion: Not Religion – But Living Faith
As soon as people start making their own rules and making access to God dependent on an institution, it is no longer discipleship, but religion. And religion is unbiblical. However, those who honestly and wholeheartedly follow the Word of God and seek fellowship with like-minded people are part of the true, biblical church – even without external affiliation.
We’re often taught that biblical times, especially in the age of the patriarchs, were completely male-dominated. This perception, shaped by medieval and early modern patriarchy, has influenced how we read Scripture. The institutional church greatly contributed to this worldview. However, even in the Middle Ages, women in certain regions had more rights than they did in later periods.
In the time of the patriarchs, women were honored and respected. Their roles differed from those of men, but they were not inferior. Miriam, the sister of Moses, held a prominent role; Deborah, a prophetess and judge, led all of Israel; and even Pharaoh’s daughter plays a key part in the biblical narrative.
If women were truly considered inferior, Sarah wouldn’t have challenged Abraham, nor would Tamar have stood up to Judah. When considering women’s roles in Scripture, we must remember:
The Bible is about God’s teaching for His people.
The practices of surrounding nations aren’t relevant to God’s standards.
We must let Scripture speak for itself, free from cultural bias.
The New Testament speaks clearly about respect toward women:
“Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.” (Ephesians 5:25) “He who loves his wife loves himself.” (Ephesians 5:28) “Husbands, love your wives and do not be harsh with them.” (Colossians 3:19)
These instructions were necessary when new believers from pagan cultures joined the Church—cultures that often devalued women. But in Israel, women already held respected positions, which is why we see so many confident women in the Old Testament, including those listed in Jesus’ genealogy: Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba – all women with remarkable stories, yet still in line with the Messiah.
created with Sora
🙋♀️ Are Women Allowed to Teach?
A common claim is that women must remain silent in church. This is based on selective readings of Paul’s letters, often taken out of context. Yet the Bible does not impose a universal silence on women. If even one woman is shown to teach, the argument collapses—and the Bible offers many:
Miriam led worship after the Red Sea crossing.
Deborah judged and led Israel—a national leader.
Sarah’s voice was confirmed by God Himself when He told Abraham to send Hagar and Ishmael away.
Mary Magdalene was the first to announce the resurrection.
Priscilla taught Apollos the way of Christ.
Phoebe was a deacon and probably the carrier and explainer of Romans.
Junia is referred to as outstanding among the apostles.
Kyria, addressed in 2 John, is likely a house church leader.
Paul’s command in 1 Corinthians addressed a specific, chaotic church setting, likely focusing on married women disrupting the gatherings. Ancient manuscripts show that parts of the passage were later additions. The real problem isn’t the Bible—it’s biased interpretations through history.
What remains is the overall context of Scripture – and that shows that women have had an important voice in religious life from the very beginning. The command to remain silent is not a universal principle, but a measure dictated by circumstances.
👑 Female Leaders and Pillars of the Faith
Scripture honors women like:
Sarah, Rebekah, Rachel, and Leah – mothers of the twelve tribes.
Huldah, who confirmed God’s word to King Josiah.
Abigail, who saved lives with her wisdom.
Esther, who risked her life for her people.
Lydia, a merchant and house church host.
Mary, the mother of Jesus, who spoke deep theological truth.
Joanna and Susanna, financial supporters of Jesus’ ministry.
These women taught, led, hosted churches, and some were even called apostles. The issue isn’t Scripture—it’s the church tradition that muted women’s voices for centuries. When we read the Bible in full, we see clearly: women were not silenced by God, but empowered by Him.
📜 Final Thoughts
The Bible doesn’t portray women as oppressed—but as honored and respected. It’s church tradition, not Scripture, that introduced systemic marginalization. It’s time we let the Word speak for itself—about both men and women who shaped the story of God’s people.
Few debates in the Christian world have stirred as much division as the doctrine of the Trinity. While many believers accept the idea of God being three persons in one essence, we must ask: does the Bible truly teach this? Or has the doctrine emerged from later theological and philosophical developments?
In this article, we will explore what the Scriptures themselves say—and don’t say—about the Trinity.
created with Sora
Historical Roots of the Trinity Doctrine
The concept of a Trinitarian God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as one being—was officially developed in the 4th century A.D., primarily through the Council of Nicaea (325 A.D.) and the Council of Constantinople (381 A.D.). These formulations were deeply influenced by Greek philosophical terms such as ousia (essence) and hypostaseis (persons).
It’s important to note: the early Christian communities, including the Apostles themselves, never used such terminology. Their understanding of God was grounded in the Hebrew Scriptures and the direct teachings of Christ—not in Hellenistic philosophy.
Is the Trinity Taught in the Bible?
One of the most frequently cited Bible passages in defense of the Trinity is 1 John 5:7-8:
“For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.” (1 John 5:7-8, KJV 1611)
However, this passage—known as the Comma Johanneum—does not appear in the earliest Greek manuscripts. Scholars widely agree that it was added during the 16th century, likely due to pressure on Erasmus during the publication of his third edition of the Greek New Testament in 1522.
Modern translations either omit this passage entirely or relegate it to footnotes with a clear remark that it is not part of the original text.
What Scholars Say
Numerous scholars and theologians—both modern and historic—acknowledge that the Trinity doctrine lacks a firm biblical foundation:
Shirley C. Guthrie Jr., in Christian Doctrine:
“The Bible does not teach the doctrine of the Trinity. The language of this doctrine is the language of the early church, which borrowed these terms from classical Greek philosophy.”
Graham Greene, Roman Catholic theologian:
“Our opponents sometimes claim that no belief should be held dogmatically which is not explicitly stated in Scripture… but the Protestant Churches have themselves accepted such dogmas as the Trinity, for which there is no such precise authority in the Gospels.”
Charles C. Ryrie, in Basic Theology:
“The New Testament does not contain an explicit doctrine of the Trinity. There is no single verse that clearly teaches one God in three persons.”
Even The HarperCollins Encyclopedia of Catholicism (1995) affirms:
“Contemporary scholars generally agree that the doctrine of the Trinity is not present in either the Old or New Testament.”
Jesus’ Own Words
If Jesus were truly co-equal and co-eternal with the Father, we would expect Him to make such claims. Instead, we read:
“I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.” (John 5:30, KJV 1611)
This verse poses a serious question: If Jesus can do nothing of Himself, how can He be all-powerful? And if He is not all-powerful, can He be God in the same sense as the Father?
Final Thoughts
The doctrine of the Trinity, as cherished and deeply rooted as it may be in Christian tradition, finds no clear or direct support in Scripture itself. Rather, it arose from post-biblical debates and philosophical interpretations of divine nature. As Bible-believing followers of Jesus, we must return to the Scriptures alone—Sola Scriptura—and not rely on creeds and councils that emerged centuries after the last apostle died.
English (UK) 
Deutsch